Re: stuff to do on Baud Day
I'm bringing an ATA, some modems, a couple radios, and a couple TNCs (packet modems) over to the local makerspace, along with the Baud Day music playlist, and we're gonna get that shit all connected one way or another. Unfortunately, since the makerspace moved, nobody has set up
the PBX/voip stuff again. So, we'll have to bring our own and figure out what to do as far as service goes. Maybe we'll do just sip to sip if we can't get a POTS service going.
Maybe some of the BBSes with dialups on ATAs would be open top
additionally have a SIP number/address :).
Oh ya, and the radios can connect to eachother at 1200 baud.
I have asterisk server with 2 extensions that can call each other but modems will not connect.
2 USR 56k modems. I don't understand why they can't complete the handshake.
Maybe some of the BBSes with dialups on ATAs would be open to additionally have a SIP number/address :).
Oh ya, and the radios can connect to eachother at 1200 baud.
Hi, good luck with your project! I recently started a project to
create intranet lines for modems and telephones using a PBX server.
I've been able to successfully connect modems and achieve speeds of
33600 kbps and higher. However, I haven't received any requests, and
it seems like people aren't interested in using their modems over SIP.
But it's not a big deal-my project is up and running and works
perfectly for our group, at least.
If I use your service over the same internet connection I currently have (that brings in my current phone service), would I be able to expect better call reliability and maybe even faster connections, or should I expect it to work about the same as what I currently have?
rmurray wrote to bbsing <=-
I have asterisk server with 2 extensions that can call each other but modems will not connect.
Hi, good luck with your project! I recently started a project to create intranet lines for modems and telephones using a PBX server.
able to successfully connect modems and achieve speeds of 33600 kbps
and higher. However, I haven't received any requests, and it seems like people aren't interested in using their modems over SIP. But it's not a big deal-my project is up and running and works perfectly for our
group, at least.
VA2RFC BBS Les Méchins, Québec Canada
SysOp: rmurray --- Modem: 1(418)317-1343 --- 4 Lines 56
kbp/s
Telnet: va2rfcbbs.photorm.net:23 FsxNet: 21:1/235 FidoNet: 1:229/114
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/64)
* Origin: VA2RFC BBS (21:1/235)
My wife works from home 2 days a week and we have spotty cell coverage,
so she can use the land line when she needs to. I'm planning on getting
rid of Comcast in favor of AT&T fiber, which means the land line goes
away. I'm tempted to throw up an Asterix container in my homelab and
run 2 SIP trunks into it.
rmurray wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
Have fun. But I should tell you that Asterisk with SIP is quite a world
of its own. I had to install it many times before finding the right setup.
I have asterisk server with 2 extensions that can call each other but modems will not connect.
2 USR 56k modems. I don't understand why they can't complete the handshake.
Maybe some of the BBSes with dialups on ATAs would be open to additionally have a SIP number/address :).
Oh ya, and the radios can connect to eachother at 1200 baud.
Hi, good luck with your project! I recently started a project to create intranet lines for modems and telephones using a PBX server. I've been able to successfully connect modems and achieve speeds of 33600 kbps and higher. However, I haven't received any requests, and it seems like
people aren't interested in using their modems over SIP. But it's not a big deal-my project is up and running and works perfectly for our group, at least.
Hi, good luck with your project! I recently started a project to create intranet lines for modems and telephones using a PBX server. I've been able to successfully connect modems and achieve speeds of 33600 kbps and higher.
I thought in order to go above 33k6 one end of the connection had to be using ISDN? Possibly my friend's off-hand comment in the 90s wasn't 100% accurate, or possibly that's true but only due to high frequency attenuation on real analogue lines?
Interested to hear your thoughts on this :)